Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
2.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.07.31.502203

ABSTRACT

Detection of SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in SARS-CoV-2- unexposed donors has been explained by the presence of T cells primed by other coronaviruses. However, based on the relative high frequency and prevalence of cross-reactive T cells, we hypothesized CMV may induce these cross-reactive T cells. Stimulation of pre-pandemic cryo-reserved PBMCs with SARS-CoV-2 peptides revealed that frequencies of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were higher in CMV-seropositive donors. Characterization of these T cells demonstrated that membrane-specific CD4+ and spike-specific CD8+ T cells originate from cross-reactive CMV-specific T cells. Spike-specific CD8+ T cells recognize SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide FVSNGTHWF (FVS) and dissimilar CMV pp65 peptide IPSINVHHY (IPS) presented by HLA-B*35:01. These dual IPS/FVS-reactive CD8+ T cells were found in multiple donors and shared a common T cell receptor (TCR), illustrating that IPS/FVS-cross-reactivity is caused by a public TCR. Importantly, these cross-reactive T cells reduced spreading of SARS-CoV-2 in airway epithelial Calu-3 cells yet they were not phenotypically activated during late-stage COVID-19, indicating that cross-reactive T cells may more likely play a role during early stage of infection. In conclusion, CMV-specific T cells cross-react with SARS-CoV-2, despite low sequence homology between the two viruses, and may contribute to the pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
3.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1289622.v1

ABSTRACT

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has raised concerns of escape from vaccine-induced immunity. A number of studies have demonstrated a reduction in antibody-mediated neutralization of the Omicron variant in vaccinated individuals. Preliminary observations have suggested that T cells are less likely to be affected by changes in Omicron. However, the complexity of human leukocyte antigen genetics and its impact upon immunodominant T-cell epitope selection suggests that the maintenance of T-cell immunity won’t be universal. In this study, we describe the impact that changes in Omicron have on recognition by spike-specific T cells. These T cells constitute the immunodominant CD8+ T-cell response in HLA-A*29:02+ COVID-19 convalescent and vaccinated individuals; however, they fail to recognize the Omicron-encoded sequence. We also failed to detect other immunodominant responses in vaccinated HLA-A*29:02+ individuals, suggesting that the Omicron variant may have an increased capacity to escape immune recognition in this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
4.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.01.12.473243

ABSTRACT

The >30 mutated residues in the Omicron spike protein have led to its rapid classification as a new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern. As a result, Omicron may escape from the immune system, decreasing the protection provided by COVID-19 vaccines. Preliminary data shows a weaker neutralizing antibody response to Omicron compared to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus, which can be increased after a booster vaccine. Here, we report that CD8+ T cells can recognize Omicron variant epitopes presented by HLA-A*02:01 in both COVID-19 recovered and vaccinated individuals, even 6 months after infection or vaccination. Additionally, the T cell response was stronger for Omicron variant epitopes after the vaccine booster. Altogether, T cells can recognize Omicron variants, especially in vaccinated individuals after the vaccine booster.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
5.
biorxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.10.13.464181

ABSTRACT

Understanding the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is critical to overcome the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Efforts are being made to understand the potential cross-protective immunity of memory T cells, induced by prior encounters with seasonal coronaviruses, in providing protection against severe COVID-19. In this study we assessed T-cell responses directed against highly conserved regions of SARS-CoV-2. Epitope mapping revealed 16 CD8 + T-cell epitopes across the nucleocapsid (N), spike (S) and ORF3a proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and five CD8 + T-cell epitopes encoded within the highly conserved regions of the ORF1ab polyprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Comparative sequence analysis showed high conservation of SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab T-cell epitopes in seasonal coronaviruses. Paradoxically, the immune responses directed against the conserved ORF1ab epitopes were infrequent and subdominant in both convalescent and unexposed participants. This subdominant immune response was consistent with a low abundance of ORF1ab encoded proteins in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Overall, these observations suggest that while cross-reactive CD8 + T cells likely exist in unexposed individuals, they are not common and therefore are unlikely to play a significant role in providing broad pre-existing immunity in the community.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19
6.
biorxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.08.15.456333

ABSTRACT

The data currently available on how the immune system recognizes the SARS-CoV-2 virus is growing rapidly. While there are structures of some SARS-CoV-2 proteins in complex with antibodies, which helps us understand how the immune system is able to recognise this new virus, we are lacking data on how T cells are able to recognize this virus. T cells, especially the cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, are critical for viral recognition and clearance. Here we report the X-ray crystallography structure of a T cell receptor, shared among unrelated individuals (public TCR) in complex with a dominant spike-derived CD8+ T cell epitope (YLQ peptide). We show that YLQ activates a polyfunctional CD8+ T cell response in COVID-19 recovered patients. We detail the molecular basis for the shared TCR gene usage observed in HLA-A*02:01+ individuals, providing an understanding of TCR recognition towards a SARS-CoV-2 epitope. Interestingly, the YLQ peptide conformation did not change upon TCR binding, facilitating the high-affinity interaction observed.


Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19
7.
ssrn; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3774361

ABSTRACT

Significant efforts are being made worldwide to understand the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, including the role of pre-existing T cell immunity. Understanding the mechanisms that promote cross-recognition by T cells induced by seasonal coronaviruses will be critical for future predictions on the role of pre-existing immunity in protection against severe disease. We demonstrate that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein induces an immunodominant response in HLA-B7+ COVID-19-recovered individuals that is also readily detectable in unexposed donors. This immunodominant response is driven by a single N-encoded epitope that displays a high degree of conservation with the homologous region in circulating coronaviruses. We show that T cell-mediated cross-reactivity can be detected towards the circulating OC43/HKU-1 coronaviruses, but not the 229E or NL63 coronaviruses, due to different peptide conformations. This cross-reactivity is driven by private T cell receptor repertoires with a bias for TRBV27 and a long CDR3b loop in unexposed and COVID-19-recovered individuals. Together, our findings demonstrate the basis of pre-existing immunity to a conserved and highly immunogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitope driven by cross-reactive memory T cells, suggesting long-lived protective immunity.Funding: This work was supported by generous donations from the QIMR Berghofer COVID 19 appeal, and financial contributions from Monash University, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO, AISNE ECR grants), Australian Research Council (ARC), National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), and the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF). H.S. is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, E.J.G. was supported by an NHMRC CJ Martin Fellowship (#1110429) and is supported by an Australian Research Council DECRA (DE210101479), K.R.S.is supported by an Australian Research Council DECRA (DE180100512), S.G. is supported by and NHMRC SRF (#1159272).Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.Ethical Approval: This study was performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.Ethics approval to undertake the research was obtained from the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Human Research Ethics Committee and Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL